The word of the week in my neck of the woods is coherence:

Dictionary.com gives the definition as:

Coherence (co·her·ence)
Pronunciation [koh-heer-uhns]
–noun
1. the act or state of cohering; cohesion.
2. logical interconnection; overall sense or understandability.
3. congruity; consistency.
4. Physics, Optics. (of waves) the state of being coherent.
5. Linguistics. the property of unity in a written text or a segment of spoken discourse that stems from the links among its underlying ideas and from the logical organization and development of its thematic content.

It’s the second and third definitions I’m interested in.

This week - in reality it happens every week - I stumbled across a number of incidences within my jurisdiction where people in positions that count (I’m talking VP marcoms worldwide, Head of Digital Marketing and the list goes on) have proved that while they are ultimately responsible for the web strategies and social initiatives of their respective companies, the day-to-day complexities and overwhelming commitments they have are asked to deal with means that their hands are tied.

In one case in particular, one of them wrote a lengthy blog article about the latest social technologies and then responded to a comment asking when his company - the world’s #1 pasta company - was to adopt social media with a friendly, “let it go”.

My question is why wouldn’t a company like that want to start using social media?

On the other side of the coin, my own little one-way run-in with Publicis just goes to show that many professionals and companies who market themselves as conversation catalysts (oxymoron intended) are simply not firing on all cylinders.

So why is this?

How is it possible that the message isn’t flowing through the corridors of power 1.0?

The answer I believe lies in coherency. If your company adopts an eco-friendly approach, you can’t do it with just the packaging and expect people to buy into it. Likewise that “please do not print this” message at the bottom of emails convinces no-one that you’re on a mission to save the planet.

Coherency means adopting it throughout the business, so that the company wholly adopts the attitude and its customers can feel it.

And with social media, it gets worse because whereas we instinctively know when we’re harming/saving the planet, it’s a damned site harder to know when we’re being truly social (meant as an effective approach to social media that brings ROi to the company and benefits to the customers), which makes it a lot easier to sell as for many (buyers and sellers), it’s snake oil.

I guess now that SM has started to go mainstream, it’ll be slowly diluted down and squeezed of every ounce of credibility. But just like HannanCustoms takes the common bicycle and does something incredible, there will always be a place in social media for true coherence.

Rate this:

3.5 (1 person)

Share This

2 Comments »

photo by monkeyc.net

I live in a world that thinks everything can be bought. No effort required, just an abundance of cash and a good agency.

I live in a world that sees advertising agencies as a bridge to customers. No creative energy is required on a company’s part, budget and brand guidelines are all that’s needed.

I live in a world that thinks marketing is a foreign language. Advertising agencies are somehow both copywriters and interpreters.

STOP!

Why have we done this to ourselves?

Whatever happened to our own personality? Is it that hard to promote or are we hoping something gets lost between the real us and the perceived us like in a game of Chinese whispers?

Why do we insist on pursuing tactics and deploy strategies that annoy the very people we aim to impress?

And perhaps more important, what is it going to take to reverse this?

You listening?

If you haven’t already felt the wind of change, where the hell have you been? Still wasting time and energy playing with the laws of diminishing returns by investing more and more of your 1.0 marketing budget in people like him, or him, or him?

Doubt it.

For a start if you had, he would have told you that 1.0 communication isn’t what he “does” anymore, as it’s like private English lessons in a foreign country. The teachers talk for 60 minutes about the rant of the day in English while the student is duped into thinking he or she is actually getting something out of it.

Sound like hard work? Of course it doesn’t because the teachers do absolutley nothing to add value for their customers.

Easy money for the teacher. Crap service for the student. Sound familiar?

Get it?

I’m not saying all English teachers are lazy. What I am saying is that their market is so huge, they don’t have to try. But what if the people the English students had to talk to couldn’t understand a word they were saying and took issue with the students?

I wonder how fast word of mouth would backfire if the onus for their students’ success rested firmly on the teachers’ shoulders?

I wonder how quickly they would re-map they way they service their customers by rooting out the real strengths and weaknesses of their students and working out a language plan based on those.

Isn’t the role of an advertising/marketing agency similar? Aren’t they supposed to point their clients in the right direction? Then why is it that so few have made the jump from diffusion to dissemination?

As Roger Anderson put it, in his piece in The Age of Conversation:

“Dissemination is an active form of distribution; diffusion is passive. Dissemination means to sow seeds. In nature, all things tend to randomness and diffusion is a perfect example. The spread of ideas or concepts among disinterested people is a passive process that also tends towards randomness. A better way to retain message consistency throughout your company, group, or organization, is to disseminate the message by creating message owners at every level.”

Why aren’t agencies able to tell their clients to be themselves, not represent themselves?

Over on the Advertising For Peanuts blog, T. Willerer has started a new language of marketing and I couldn’t agree more.

• consumers → people
• campaign → conversation
• 30 second spot → 30 second interaction
• direct response → direct conversation
• Customer Relationship Management (CRM) → Vendor Relationship Management (VRM)
• purchase funnel → instant research & purchase
• reach → attention
• consumer insight → human truth
• marketing mix modeling → predictably irrational
• brand loyalty → loyal brands
• advertising agency → business partner

Look again and all it is is a transformation from an analytical language to an emotional one. Is it that hard to get across?

Fortunately for me, it seems that it is. Not everyone wants to try another form of communication. Most are still happy to spend weeks coming up with a cunning message and then (hundreds of) thousands of dollars trying to push it down your throat. I say they can keep it.

Yet some companies out there have a real passion for what they do. You can almost spot them a mile away.

They believe in engaging their customers, and see that as part of their long-term growth strategy.

Those are the companies I’m seeking out.

The others can go their own way.

Still not getting it?

Then you need to read this:

7 Principles to fully engage your customers: written by Bryan K. Williams

Once you’re done with that, have a look at these:

7 Principles to Fully Engage Your Customers - Part 2 - There I was…excited to dine in a popular steakhouse with my wife. After all, this night was to celebrate her final day of coursework in her professional degree program. Although we eat out regularly, we especially were looking forward …

Seth Godin - Hershey, American Airlines and SchoolClick.com - I tell them I love your country – but I’m doing business in the US please transfer me back to my country where they speak my language and where there is not a ten second delay each time he or I say a word - making the conversation…

Redefining reach; the new marketing equation - While I was at StartupCamp this past Sunday here in San Francisco a few of the future founders came up to me asking my advice on how they should approach PR/advertising. Many of their questions (as small pre-startups) echo the same…

Why Fall in Love with a Company? - They were green way before their time, way way before anyone else was, another layer to it’s 50 plus year history and integrity - both of which - speak loudly to where I want to spend my dollars. I guess you could say we’ve been married…

The Sales pitch is dead. Time to re-invent selling - Do you remember a decade or so ago when focus switched from ‘getting’ customers (selling) to keeping them? Sales-led organizations the world over were struck in particular by Fred Reichheld’s book The Loyalty Effect (1996) with his bath…

Rate this:

2.5

Share This

No Comments »

So here we are at last.

Just a few more miles and this leg of the journey will be over. A few more twists and turns and the road will open up. A slight reprieve before it closes in on the biggest junction of my life.

There are only two choices: left or right. Both will take me on a journey of discovery. I’ll see the world no matter which way I turn, but I’ll see it from different points of view.

One then, excludes the other.

Turn left, and join the ranks. Promotion awaits with all the rewards and satisfaction that working for a big brand can bring. Daddy brings home the trophy of success, and the family celebrates this newfound stability with a sumptuous meal and smiles all round.

Turn right and I’m on my own. A lone voice with no safety net, no support and certainly no guarantees. My family depends solely on me so the risks and consequences of failure are unthinkable.

Left is the obvious choice. I have put in ten years of sheer hard work to get to where I am today. I have a voice that counts in my corner of the world and my craft is appreciated and promoted by the corridors of power.

So why am I even considering right?

I have the Cluetrain Manifesto to thank for that.

One year ago, there was no right. There was no left either, as there was no choice.

One career, one strategy, one result.

Then the Cluetrain arrived and opened my eyes like a new religion.

I had felt the tremors of change underfoot, I had read about it while trying to deepen the consciousness of my profession, and I had even sampled its power on two occasions and in quick succession. But before Cluetrain, I had never really understood it.

As the saying goes, when the student is ready, the teacher will appear.

The Cluetrain hit me head on. I was ready for it before I even knew what it was about and once on board, everything about me changed.

And now my dear friend Richard has dragged me into this new meme, and I have to explain what the Cluetrain is and whether it’s had an impact on my professional outlook. Me?

Let’s start with question 1.

1) What does the Cluetrain manifesto mean to you? How has the book and theses influenced or not influenced you?

My answer to this question is not difficult to surmise, given the way I started this post. For me, the Cluetrain was the precursor to the events that are beginning to engulf me. But whereas before they were impossible to comprehend, now they are impossible to ignore.

It is, of course, about connections, dialogue and transparency.

It’s as much about getting inside the hearts and minds of customers as it is getting inside the hearts of businesses. It’s about breaking down corporate walls that serve no other purpose than to protect the status quo. It’s about a change in attitude that affects us in equal measure whether we are marketers or customers.

The Cluetrain Manifesto starts off with a statement that more or less sums up the entire philosophy, a phrase that succinctly pinpoints which side of the fence you’re on with the precision and real time accuracy of military grade GPS positioning systems:

“A powerful global conversation has begun.”

You’re either participating or you’re not.

Every single word of this phrase is key to understanding the true meaning of the Manifesto.

“Powerful”

Thanks to the time-honoured practice of command and control, companies have stopped listening to customers and in doing so have chosen to ignore the force, wisdom and power of the many.

Now that customers have the technology they need to interact with each other, their numbers, opinions and voices have suddenly started to count.

Even the Buddhist concept of Itai Doshin (many in body, one in mind) is built on this principle and was used to great effect by Nicherin Daishonin in the 13th Century.

“If itai doshin prevails among the people, they will achieve all their goals…”

Translation: Ignore your customers at your own peril.

“Global”

It’s bigger than you think. Everywhere people rediscover the value of their own voices, conversations will emerge. “Everywhere” on the web is not geographical, nor is it temporal. Everywhere on the web is technological so the more ways people discover to communicate their opinions, the faster their message will spread and louder their voices will resonate.

Translation: You haven’t got it covered anymore. It’s out of your control.

“Conversation”

This is the biggest word in the opening sentence and not just by size. It gives cause for existence for the first two.

As the Cluetrain makes painfully clear, marketing departments were introduced to bridge the gap between mass products and mass markets and in doing so, wiped out conversations between producers and their customers and replaced them with alienation and mystery.

Now customers have a voice, the official version of business as usual can finally be debunked in full view of everybody.

Translation: The true you is out in the open. Are you ashamed of it?

“has begun”

This is in the present perfect. i.e. it started at some point in the past and is still continuing in the present.

Translation: There’s nothing you can do about it, except join in. You can’t ignore it forever no matter how much fear you have of engaging your customers in real dialogue. The longer you wait, the bigger the gap between you and your company’s chances of survival.

In short, and in answer to question 1:

• It’s a measure of how afraid companies are of change.
• It’s an indication of how far they still have to go.
• It’s the reason companies “get it”, or not.
• It’s the reason I’m turning right.

2) Which companies have best implemented the Cluetrain Manifesto in your opinion and how were they effective?

Like Richard I am not in a position to give any real answer to this. Yet the one thing I do know, which won’t surprise any of you, is that the number of those that haven’t implemented it far outweigh those that have.

Having said that, I also don’t think that the Cluetrain Manifesto is something you simply slot in to a business model. Each company has it’s own take on how much they are prepared to let go and my feeling here is the bigger their exposure to risk, the shorter the leash on transparency.

Many of the companies in my own area act as if it’s in the interests of everyone to keep things as they are. After all, millions of dollars worth of marketing processes have been painstakingly put in place and the system can’t justify a reversal in policy just because Joe Public wants a say in things.

I know it’s unfair and I know it’s not correct but until Joe Public makes a large enough fuss so that the company panics into a response, the shift isn’t going to happen.

Dell backed its way out of a very ugly situation thanks to a change in mindset and was advised extremely well by those behind its digital media arm. Yet I can’t help feeling that others are waiting for a similar catastrophic reason to get involved, as if it were Plan B or even C on their crisis management policy rather than an opportunity to rekindle all the trust and loyalty squandered over the years through command and control policies.

The other hole in the system comes from the companies who should be advising big corporations to give it a go. Again, in my experience, there are often more important and more lucrative things on the table. Balancing a shift in approach, commitment and transparency with the laws of diminishing returns on the significant investments needed to keep a social media presence afloat isn’t something they have the balls to push through right now.

Perhaps the market isn’t ready for it just yet. Perhaps Joe Public isn’t ready to take on the liberties offered to him by the Cluetrain Manifesto, no matter how ideologically sound it may be. I don’t think this is it.

In my experience, the few of us who get it don’t have the necessary influence to bring its principles to the discussion table, no matter how hard we try and for how long.

As it turns out, fear runs at very high levels.

In the unofficial blog I created to test the conversational water for Acer, TheAcerGuy, I have tried to apply the Cluetrain principles from the start, only publishing reviews of Acer products written by genuine customers, who are given full control over their message and a semi-official platform upon which their voices can be published, whether they are helping, complaining, gloating or venting.

Once over the initial and understandable fear of losing objectivity, this approach has turned out to be the single most intelligent thing I have so far done with the site.

Yet no matter how good the reviews, I cannot convince any of my superiors to see the immense value in this approach.

Again, another reason I’m turning right.

3) In thesis 57, the Cluetrain manifesto states, “smart companies will get out of the way and help the inevitable to happen sooner.” In light of that thesis, is encouraging employees to use social media and blogging a good idea? Is it really effective, when an employee is encouraged but not directed?

Again, my response to this question is based entirely on what my limited experience has taught me.

In the IT world, there are two approaches to corporate blogging: indirect and full on.

HP has, at last count, 66 blogs (http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/blogs/bloggers.html) and all of them without exception have this footer:

“Opinions expressed here and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors, not of HP and may not have been reviewed in advance by HP.”

Over at Dell, there is just one blog, and no footer.

On the contrary there is a single page dedicated to underlining the commitment to standing behind the conversations http://direct2dell.com/one2one/about.aspx

Both companies’ blogs contain articles by people trained to stick by the corporate message, but one of them puts the interests of the company first, so that you read the blog through a sort of legal filter that at a moment’s notice would distance itself from a perilous comment to save the integrity of the company.

Meanwhile the other stands by what it says. Everything there is on the record and policy.

I know which approach I trust more.

4) How can a company encourage employees to use social media, and empower them to answer customer questions and learn from customers?

By understanding that respect, trust and loyalty are the greatest assets a company possesses, and that through these core values, a company builds a reputation for excellence and permission to engage its customers.

By building an environment that promotes these values among its employees before anything else.

By carefully explaining the opportunities and implications of social media to its employees with regular updates and raining sessions.

By showing trust in its employees by allowing them to engage freely in answering customer questions.

By standing by its employees if the conversation becomes negative.

From a concierge of a downtown hotel to the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, if there’s love, then that will come through in the conversation.

5) Do all employees want to talk with customers? If not what percentage want to internetwork and converse?

Again, I am not the right person to answer this question but I have an observation. From my own conversations, I have found people willing to talk from the most unlikely situations and reluctance from the most obvious.

Current thinking says that people in command should do the talking but that’s not the case.

I have college students willing to answer on behalf of a client, support staff from a repair center in the middle of nowhere desperate to change the way they talk to customers and managers who like the idea but don’t have the clout (or the balls) to start.

Not everyone can hold a conversation. Not everyone should. It would be nice if all CEOs had mega-personalities but as so often happens this is hardly ever the case.

I believe that companies should listen to themselves before launching an online presence and allow anyone on the payroll to have a say if they want to. If they’re honest, they only have to gain from the experience.

Now that I’ve answred all five questions it was supposed to be my turn to nominate another five people to do the same. Cluetrain doesn’t follow rules and besides, there is only one person I want to hear from regarding Cluetrain, and she needs no introduction from me. So over to you Valeria Maltoni.

I am going to be keeping my eye on this meme, especially as Groundswell seems to be gaining momentum. In the meantime, if you’re interested in reading more on this subject and how it’s affected people like me and businesses like your clients’, you couldn’t go far wrong with these:

Cluetrainings - Doc Searls - Here are the slides from the Cluetrain @ 10 talk I gave at There’sa New Conversation, in New York last month and a video of the talk… Cluetrain at 10 - The Cluetrain Manifesto is all about fundamental changes that we are living and experiencing… Approaching 10 Years After Cluetrain, Most Still Don’t Get It - Is it really the 10th anniversary of The Cluetrain Manifesto…? 2 On Cluetrain At 10 - Phil Gomes and Richard Binhammer have both answered the five questions I asked them in my post related to the critique the cluetrain manifesto…. After 10 years, most still don’t get it - the Cluetrain Manifesto … - Let’s take a couple of minutes to talk about The Cluetrain Manifesto because many of my readers are new to social media marketing… The Cluetrain Manifesto at 10 - Dell’s Richard Binhammer was kind enough to ping me in a meme going around about The Cluetrain Manifesto as it approaches its 10th anniversary… Cluetrain, 10 years after - In Forrester’s Josh Bernoff / Charlene Li blog, on how Lego changed by engaging with AFOLs (Adult Fans Of Lego, sometimes referred to as ALE: Adult Lego Enthusiasts). … Cluetrain Revisited: Doc Searls, still radical 10 years later … - Doc Searls started his talk at the Cluetrain @ 10 event talking about the genesis of The Cluetrain Manifesto… After 10 years, most still don’t get it - the Cluetrain Manifesto … - There are some people with very strong voices & Valeria Maltoni has one that’s worth listening to… The Cluetrain Manifesto Conversation - If The Cluetrain Manifesto is still news after 10 years from its publication, the conversation that ensued has evolved… Have You Heard of Cluetrain? - Just under 10 years ago a website then book was released called The Cluetrain Manifesto. I did a quickie poll on Twitter and found around half of people questioned had heard of it. Today I want to repeat the experiment here. …

Rate this:

2.5

Share This

3 Comments »

I have just done something I thought I would never have the opportunity to do again.

I took a week off.

Yes I checked my mails, yes I did drive 250 miles back to Milan for a meeting that didn’t need me there. But even though I was still ‘on’, I actually took a week ‘off’.

It’s amazing how a few days can clear your mind, or in my case, make it up.

Now I’m back, I feel refreshed, revitalized and, more importantly, re-focused.

More than thinking outside the box, it’s as if I see the world above the clouds. Possibilities, opportunities, potential, all within my grasp, yet seemingly so far from my clients’…

Shame the real world is fast approaching beneath my feet.

I still have time left. Time to solicit a website I’ve been waiting 9 months to be delivered, time to start the biggest project of my life, time to look my kids straight in the eye, and giggle with them for hours on end.

Soon, routine will settle in with all the unpleasantness of a small dog whose cocky bark repeats incessantly with bone grating persistence. Soon can wait, right now, I’m a star.

Best not to think about tomorrow when today is so sunny, so sweet.

Taking a week off from Twitter, RSS feeds and even newspapers is a very, very pleasant experience for no other reason than you are suddenly presented with an inordinately large dollop of time on your hands. Time to decide… Time to kill… Time to think… Time to breathe…

Remember what that felt like? Didn’t think so.

In the fast connected world, time isn’t actually used by us, we do not hold the keys to our time. More often than not it is used (badly) by our clients to get things done (badly). It’s taken from us, and we readily give it up in return for feeling part of the moment, part of the big equation. How sad is that?

One of my random thoughts concerned a very big client of a client who’s taking too long to get what I can help them embrace. Not just social networks, the whole online caboodle. The web, its codes, conduct and - now - transparency are all beyond what they’re prepared to welcome on board in one fell swoop. They need more time to absorb the message, assess the potential damage and prepare their excuses.

And in my current position of outsourced copywriter, I’m not exactly in a position to help.

Which brings me back to time. When you have enough time on your hands to realize that you don’t have the time your clients need to decide, what do you do?

You start your own project, that’s what you do.

Thanks to the one person I’m always happy to hear from and who has inspired me without knowing it, I am expanding my product portfolio to include conversation marketing. I think I’ll be the only one selling (or buying) it for a while in Italy but at least I’ll be in excellent company

A new service will allow me to concentrate on using my time well for the benefit of my clients, or in other words: the better I use my time, the better the quality of service I offer my clients.

And the project? Well I’ve just got off the phone with a web design agency in Toronto and am happy to say I’m going to give them the green light. I can’t believe that after twelve years, my little idea will finally get the chance to prove its worth. I hope I don’t make a hash of it as without wishing to sound too full of myself, the world really does need something like this.

Thought that would make you jump.

If any of you know any English language teachers or bloggers/writers looking to participate in something really radical (and get paid for it), please give them my mail. Trust me, they will thank you.

Rate this:

2.5

Share This

4 Comments »

With all this talk of interior revolution, the spectre of Net Neutrality has resurfaced once again. This time from an Italian blogger/journalist I haven’t yet met, but look forward to doing so soon.

Marco Camisani Calzolari writes for the IT supplement of one of Italy’s most respected financial newspapers. He has often described himself as a “bridge between the slow world and the fast world” and Shel, the next time you’re in Italy you should look him up.

On his blog, Marco has published this scary image of the future should the campaign for Net Neutrality be lost. It would be sad to lose my ideas for those online activities my wife and I are currently working on, but it would be a disaster for humanity to lose the possibility to discover knowledge. I’m thinking of the language course, of course, particularly as it now has a name: Language Is Free.

The picture’s here, but credit for it goes to Marco. Spread the word…

Rate this:

2.5

Share This

No Comments »

Moving on from my last post, it’s becoming harder and harder for me to concentrate on some of the things I’d like to in this blog as many of the wheels I’ve set in motion are beginning to turn very rapidly indeed.

These wheels are teaching me the lesson of a lifetime but while I’m busy absorbing, it’s becoming very difficult to produce. Or at least share…

Time has become an issue lately with me. Let me put that differently: Time has an issue with me.

I just can’t get around to organizing my day in such a way as to have a start and a finish. It’s just a continual blur, just like one of my son’s frantic scribbles, whizzing back and forth with amazing power and authority only to produce what can best be described as a colourful mess.

I don’t know about you but I’ve now settled into following a few blogs directly on NetVibes rather than slavishly scouring my aggregator for keywords. That at least allows me to keep in touch without taking too much time away from my 9-to-5 (that’s pm to am ;-))

I think some of the best blogs right now are Jack Humphrey’s and Jane May’s, if only because the first talks straight, no-holds-barred authority tactics that go down like a glass of Glenfiddich with no ice. The second is far more gentle and surprisingly encouraging. Their styles are so different yet so equal in their appeal. Maybe it’s just because they know their stuff and write damned well.

Speaking of Jack Humphrey, he’s just launched a new Web 2.0 marketing tool that I like so much I bought it the moment it came out. It’s called Web2Submitter and it’s so clever you wonder why nobody thought about it earlier.

If you’re not clear about the principles of Social Powerlinking and are scared by sites like Go2Web20.net, I thoroughly recommend you hop over to Jack’s site and read this.

Anyway, the beauty of Web2Submitter is that it automatically submits submits your blog posts to Web 2.0 sites like Digg, Netscape, Reddit, Shoutwire, Plime, Newsvine and Stumble Upon , creating countless backlinks, traffic and a whole lot of authority in just a few clicks.

Like I said, brilliant.

Rate this:

2.5

Share This

No Comments »

I made an important discovery yesterday. One of those blinding flashes that sneak up on you when you least expect them, yet are so bright they burn colourful imprints onto your retina so that you can still see them even if you close your eyes.

It seems I have more in common with Hugh McLeod than I imagined.

Many years ago I dropped out of university before I even had the chance to start. I went to a very good private school in England and was all set to follow the crib-to-grave groove and enter the medical profession.

Until I went to hospital.

The school organized a works-experience week and I and two others (who made it to the other side) were shuffled into an operating theatre to see what surgeons do first hand. It also gave me the opportunity to see who the surgeons were.

That day I learnt the most important lesson of my life. Who you are and what you do aren’t necessarily the same thing.

The English education system makes it almost impossible to back out of your chosen career path at the last minute which is why at the tender age of 19, I found myself on a plane heading to Italy, where I’ve lived ever since.

That day returned to me recently during one of those “what am I doing with my life??” moments when I was blinded by that flash I mentioned earlier.

It seems that the cutting edge of the blogosphere is social networking. It’s like a massive, uncontrollable Hollywood-style scandal rag reporting ‘round the clock on who’s sleeping where, who said what and how my judgement is invariably wiser than yours.

Getting on this train is easy: Read, write and link. Read, write and link. Hugh calls it “people talking” and people talk perpetually.

Like mainstream chat show ghosts, the stars of the blogosphere are beyond reproach. They’re sneezers, opinion makers, forces to be reckoned with. The rest of us drop like flies.

There is a holier-than-thow element to this. Apparently, to be successful, you’ve got to have your ear (aggregator) to the ground, know the movers and shakers and hang out at the right blog expos. Even better, vlog about them. Corporations in particular can’t miss a beat.

Now I’m the first to admit that, expos aside, I do this myself – I’m doing it on this blog and in this post. It’s also how I met my friend, colleague and rival Richard and it’s how I plan on meeting many others in future.

That’s what I do. But is it who I am?

Didn’t blogging start out as a “web log”? A diary of me, my thoughts and a way of sharing my chunk of life?

I guess at some point some big-boy bloggers’ personal conversations dried up and they sought out other conversations, building traffic for no other reason than because they channelled their thoughts into the comments of others (link love), fuelling a never-ending conversation that systematically leads them towards a conversational anti-climax they knew was coming anyway.

Boy does this system get you noticed (and ranked).

But what exactly is the point?

In my book, the only things that ignite and build genuine interest either have a start and a finish or, at the very least, a sense of purpose. Anything else is just a scratched record, with clicks replaced by links that, sooner or later, take you back to where you started.

For my job, the Edelman/Vista fiasco had a start and a finish and it was an amazing experience to be in the middle. Following and countering the adverse PR for my client was an education in syndication management. The bickering about who got the damned Ferrari notebooks and who didn’t frankly didn’t light my pipe at all.

So where’s the link with Hugh? Hugh writes passionately about purpose in the epic “How to be Creative” article.

“One evening, after one false start too many, I just gave up. Sitting at a bar, feeling a bit burned out by work and life in general, I just started drawing on the back of business cards for no reason. I didn’t really need a reason. I just did it because it was there, because it amused me in a kind of random, arbitrary way.

Of course it was stupid. Of course it was uncommercial. Of course it wasn’t going to go anywhere. Of course it was a complete and utter waste of time. But in retrospect, it was this built-in futility that gave it its edge. Because it was the exact opposite of all the “Big Plans” my peers and I were used to making.

It was so liberating not to have to be thinking about all that, for a change.

It was so liberating to be doing something that didn’t have to impress anybody, for a change.

It was so liberating to have something that belonged just to me and no one else, for a change.

It was so liberating to feel complete sovereignty, for a change. To feel complete freedom, for a change.

And of course, it was then, and only then, that the outside world started paying attention.”

I just walked that same path with my wife and our Runaway Parents and Genitori in Fuga projects. The fact is, it’s got nothing at all to do with what we do, but everything about who we really are.

There’s a different flavour to projects you have, to use Hugh’s words, “complete sovereignty over”.

“The sovereignty you have over your work will inspire far more people than the actual content ever will. How your own sovereignty inspires other people to find their own sovereignty, their own sense of freedom and possibility, will change the world far more than the work’s objective merits ever will.

Your idea doesn’t have to be big. It just has to be yours alone. The more the idea is yours alone, the more freedom you have to do something really amazing.”

Writing about who you are also puts what you do into perspective, draining some of its ultimate value perhaps, but forcing you to put your long-term strategy into perspective.

Even if you still can’t resist that one last link to someone further up the tree who absolutely, without question has something interesting to say about the state of the union.

Rate this:

2.5

Share This

1 Comment »

It is with a large lump in my throat that I have taken the decision to change my RSS feeds over there on the right hand margin.

Despite hanging on to the smallest glimmer of hope for the longest time, it seems clear that  Kathy Sierra really has decided that enough is enough. I am sorry to see her go as her blog was perhaps the first one that truly captivated me.

So how do you replace something of that calibre?

Many thanks to the ever-affable RichardatDell for pointing me in the direction of David  Armano’s simply fascinating Logic+Emotion blog.

The pace has risen. Can’t wait to get up to speed.

Rate this:

2.5

Share This

1 Comment »

Found quite possibly the most informative video on Web 2.0 I’ve ever seen this morning.

Compiled by Michael Wesch, Assistant Professor of Cultural Anthropology at Kansas State University, it’s a phenominally quick revue of the changes that have happened over the web’s brief history and a profound look at the implications of these changes.

Watch and learn.

Rate this:

2.5

Share This

No Comments »

I had no idea this was on the cards.

Just as I started to believe in the power of the many, it looks like some of the few have very different plans for the future of the Internet.

Spread the word.

Rate this:

2.5

Share This

No Comments »